Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Coachman v. State

Coachman v. State

506 So. 2d 479, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1174, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8084
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 6, 1987·No. No. 4-86-1170·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial because of the trial court’s failure to conduct a hearing concerning the state’s alleged discovery violation in failing to disclose the substance of incriminating statements allegedly made by the appellant and subsequently used against her at trial. Blatch v. State, 495 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coachman v. State, 506 So. 2d 479, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1174, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8084 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

506 So. 2d 479 (Coachman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blatch v. State
495 So. 2d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)