Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Co-Ordinating Corp. v.Mengel Co.

Co-Ordinating Corp. v.Mengel Co.

152 Misc. 272, 273 N.Y.S. 210, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1462
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 21, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 152 Misc. 272 (Co-Ordinating Corp. v.Mengel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Co-Ordinating Corp. v.Mengel Co., 152 Misc. 272, 273 N.Y.S. 210, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1462 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

As there was no issue of fact presented on. the motion it was error to appoint a referee. (Slutzkin v. Gerhard & Hey, Inc., 195 App. Div. 559; Buchholtz v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co., 59 id. 566.)

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and matter remitted to the court below for decision on the papers.

Callahan and Frankenthaler, JJ., concur; Shientag, J., dissents in part in memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buchholtz v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
59 A.D. 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Slutzkin v. Gerhard & Hey, Inc.
195 A.D. 559 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
Shillman v. Toulson
211 A.D. 336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 Misc. 272, 273 N.Y.S. 210, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/co-ordinating-corp-vmengel-co-nyappterm-1934.