Co-Operative Transit Co. v. Dayoub

138 F.2d 534, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2573
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 13, 1943
DocketNo. 9484
StatusPublished

This text of 138 F.2d 534 (Co-Operative Transit Co. v. Dayoub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Co-Operative Transit Co. v. Dayoub, 138 F.2d 534, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2573 (6th Cir. 1943).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the trial court did not err in instructing the jury by pointing out the inconsistency between the answer to interrogatory No. 4 and the general verdict, Rulé 49(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c; and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury, Cleveland R. Co. v. Hunt, 116 Ohio St. 291, 156 N.E. 133; Cleveland R. Co. v. Merk, 124 Ohio St. 596, 180 N.E. 51; Yager, Receiver, v. Marshall, 129 Ohio St. 584, 196 N.E. 375, it is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Hunt
156 N.E. 133 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)
Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Merk
180 N.E. 51 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1932)
Yager, Recr. v. Marshall
196 N.E. 375 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 F.2d 534, 1943 U.S. App. LEXIS 2573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/co-operative-transit-co-v-dayoub-ca6-1943.