Co-Operative Homestead Co. v. Dickman

67 So. 140, 68 Fla. 462
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 9, 1914·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Cockrell, J.

This is an appeal from an order confirming a sale, consequent upon a. final decree in foreclosure. Nearly six months had elapsed between the entry of that order, and much more than six months after the final decree. All the assignments as argued, question the propriety of the final decree and interlocutory orders entered before that decree.

While an appeal from a final decree opens up all preceding orders, an appeal from a supplemental order merely carrying out that decree does not bring up the final decree. Judson Lumber Co. v. Patterson, decided this term.

[463]*463Order affirmed.

Shackleford, C. J., and Taylor, Hocker and Whitfield, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Co-Operative Homestead Co. v. Dickman, 67 So. 140, 68 Fla. 462 (Fla. 1914).

67 So. 140 (Co-Operative Homestead Co. v. Dickman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
16 So. 2d 730 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Hollywood, Inc. v. Clark
15 So. 2d 175 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Spaulding v. Bozic
135 So. 801 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)