Co-Op. Gin & Elevator Co. v. Asbury

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Co-Op. Gin & Elevator Co. v. Asbury

1913 OK 650, 142 P. 802, 40 Okla. 141, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 36

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 18, 1913

Docket4016

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1913 OK 650 (Co-Op. Gin & Elevator Co. v. Asbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Co-Op. Gin & Elevator Co. v. Asbury, 1913 OK 650, 142 P. 802, 40 Okla. 141, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 36 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

TURNER, J.

This cause was tried in the court below before a judge pro tempore, who, on December 4, 1911, overruled a motion for a new trial, and made and entered an order extending the time for plaintiff in error to make and serve a case-made for a period of^ 60 days from said date. In the same order plaintiff was given ten days thereafter to suggest amendments, the case-made to be signed and settled upon three day’s notice by either party. But the same was not signed and settled by the judge pro tempore until the 2d day of May, 1912. The motion of defendant in error to dismiss, on the ground that the judge pro tempore was without power to sign and settle the *142 case-made after the time fixed in the order had expired, is sustained. City of Shawnee v. State Publishing Co. et al., 33 Okla. 363, 125 Pac. 462; Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Preston, 63 Kan. 819, 66 Pac. 1050.

HAYES, C. J., and KANE and LOOFBOURROW, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TURNER, J.

This cause was tried in the court below before a judge pro tempore, who, on December 4, 1911, overruled a motion for a new trial, and made and entered an order extending the time for plaintiff in error to make and serve a case-made for a period of^ 60 days from said date. In the same order plaintiff was given ten days thereafter to suggest amendments, the case-made to be signed and settled upon three day’s notice by either party. But the same was not signed and settled by the judge pro tempore until the 2d day of May, 1912. The motion of defendant in error to dismiss, on the ground that the judge pro tempore was without power to sign and settle the *142 case-made after the time fixed in the order had expired, is sustained. City of Shawnee v. State Publishing Co. et al., 33 Okla. 363, 125 Pac. 462; Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. Preston, 63 Kan. 819, 66 Pac. 1050.

HAYES, C. J., and KANE and LOOFBOURROW, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent, and not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK 650, 142 P. 802, 40 Okla. 141, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/co-op-gin-elevator-co-v-asbury-okla-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack