C.N. v. State
684 So. 2d 298, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12883, 1996 WL 714083
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1996·No. No. 96-689·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
C.N. appeals the final order of delinquency adjudicating him guilty of attempted burglary.- We reverse because the State failed to present evidence that was inconsistent with [299] his reasonable hypothesis of innocence. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989); Luscomb v. State, 660 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); J.C.S. v. State, 613 So.2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
C.N. v. State, 684 So. 2d 298, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12883, 1996 WL 714083 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
684 So. 2d 298 (C.N. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WEP, JR. v. State
790 So. 2d 1166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)