CMR Energy, L.P. v. Martin Guarjardo

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 2010
Docket04-09-00723-CV
StatusPublished

This text of CMR Energy, L.P. v. Martin Guarjardo (CMR Energy, L.P. v. Martin Guarjardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CMR Energy, L.P. v. Martin Guarjardo, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion



                      • • • •



MEMORANDUM OPINION


No. 04-09-00723-CV


CMR ENERGY, L.P.,

Appellant


v.


Martin GUAJARDO and Celia Guajardo,

Appellees


From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 06-06-21768-MCV

Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding


PER CURIAM

Sitting:            Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

                        Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 17, 2010 


JOINT MOTION TO REVERSE AND REMAND GRANTED; REVERSED AND REMANDED


            The parties have filed a joint motion stating they have fully resolved and settled all issues in dispute. The parties ask that we reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for entry of a take nothing judgment in accordance with the settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties have also asked that we release and discharge CMR Energy, L.P., as principal, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, as surety, from the supersedeas bond filed to suspend execution of judgment. The parties have agreed that each party will bear its own costs.

            We grant the motion. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of a take nothing judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. The supersedeas bond filed by CMR Energy, L.P., as principal, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, as surety, is released and all obligations thereon are discharged. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. And, the clerk of this court, as requested by the parties, is ordered to issue the mandate contemporaneously with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
CMR Energy, L.P. v. Martin Guarjardo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cmr-energy-lp-v-martin-guarjardo-texapp-2010.