C.M. v. New York City Department Of Education
This text of C.M. v. New York City Department Of Education (C.M. v. New York City Department Of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
C.M., on behalf of his minor child, G.M., Plaintiff, No. 23-cv-3361 (RA) v. ORDER NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendant.
RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 4, 2024 New York, New York ki. A/C Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
C.M. v. New York City Department Of Education, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cm-v-new-york-city-department-of-education-nysd-2024.