Clymore v. Williams

77 Ill. 618
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 77 Ill. 618 (Clymore v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clymore v. Williams, 77 Ill. 618 (Ill. 1875).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Two errors appear in the record that are fatal to the present judgment. The suit was commenced in assumpsit, with an attachment in aid. There being no personal service on defendant, and no appearance, it was improper to award a general execution against the property of defendant. Young v. Campbell, 5 Gilm. 8.

It was also erroneous to award a special execution "against certain lands of defendant, for the reason, that what purports to be a levy under the attachment writ, was not signed bv the officer who had it to execute, or any one else. There was in fact no levy upon real estate, or any other property, so far as the present return shows.

There was service upon certain parties, as garnishees, but no proceedings seem to have been taken against either of them. It is indispensable, to give the court jurisdiction in attachment proceedings, where there is no personal service, it should appear the writ was either levied upon property, or served upon garnishees having effects, dioses in action or credits in their possession or power, belonging to defendant. Haywood v. Collins, 60 Ill. 328. Neither appears in the present record. No proceedings having been had against the garnishees. it can not be known whether-they had effects, dioses in action or credits in their possession or power, belonging to defendant.

On account of the errors indicated, the judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded.

, Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haller v. Rieth
247 Ill. App. 541 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1928)
J. S. Paterson Construction Co. v. First State Bank
133 Ill. App. 75 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1907)
State Bank v. Thweatt
111 Ill. App. 599 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1904)
Tennent-Stribbling Shoe Co. v. Hargardine-McKittrick Dry Goods Co.
58 Ill. App. 368 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)
Schrorer v. Pettibone
58 Ill. App. 436 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)
First Nat. Bank v. Jasper County Bank
32 N.W. 400 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1887)
Lord v. Babel
16 Ill. App. 434 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 Ill. 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clymore-v-williams-ill-1875.