Clymer v. Bowen

Fifth Circuit

Clymer v. Bowen

84 F. 1016, 28 C.C.A. 680, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1991

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 25, 1898

DocketNo. 614

StatusPublished

This text of 84 F. 1016 (Clymer v. Bowen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clymer v. Bowen, 84 F. 1016, 28 C.C.A. 680, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1991 (5th Cir. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second writ of error in this case, and presents no questions not considered in the first writ. On the last trial in the circuit court the case seems to have been submitted on substantially the same evidence as on the first trial, and the rulings of the trial judge on the questions presented and now assigned as erroneous were in conformity with the views expressed by this court on the first writ. Bowen v. Clymer, 24 C. C. A. 446, 79 Fed. 53. The equitable defense presented on the’ first trial was somewhat accented on the last; but no question is raised thereby which we can now consider. As we find no sufficient reason to change our views as to the law applicable, the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the second writ of error in this case, and presents no questions not considered in the first writ. On the last trial in the circuit court the case seems to have been submitted on substantially the same evidence as on the first trial, and the rulings of the trial judge on the questions presented and now assigned as erroneous were in conformity with the views expressed by this court on the first writ. Bowen v. Clymer, 24 C. C. A. 446, 79 Fed. 53. The equitable defense presented on the’ first trial was somewhat accented on the last; but no question is raised thereby which we can now consider. As we find no sufficient reason to change our views as to the law applicable, the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F. 1016, 28 C.C.A. 680, 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 1991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clymer-v-bowen-ca5-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack