Clyde Stanley v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock

Fourth Circuit

Clyde Stanley v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39036, 1996 WL 24668

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 24, 1996

Docket95-7573

StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1233 (Clyde Stanley v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clyde Stanley v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, 74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39036, 1996 WL 24668 (4th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clyde STANLEY, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-7573.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Clyde Stanley, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stanley v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-2113-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

74 F.3d 1233
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clyde STANLEY, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; T. Travis Medlock, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 95-7573.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 11, 1996.
Decided Jan. 24, 1996.

Clyde Stanley, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stanley v. South Carolina, No. CA-94-2113-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 F.3d 1233, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39036, 1996 WL 24668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clyde-stanley-v-state-of-south-carolina-t-travis-m-ca4-1996.