Clyde Scott and Amanda Scott v. George McGraw and Sherry McGraw
This text of Clyde Scott and Amanda Scott v. George McGraw and Sherry McGraw (Clyde Scott and Amanda Scott v. George McGraw and Sherry McGraw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals Tenth Appellate District of Texas
10-23-00415-CV
Clyde Scott and Amanda Scott, Appellants
v.
George McGraw and Sherry McGraw, Appellees
On appeal from the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Texas Judge James E. Lagomarsino, presiding Trial Court Cause No. D21-30058-CV
CHIEF JUSTICE JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On May 27, 2025, the appellants, Clyde Scott and Amanda Scott, and the
appellees, George McGraw and Sherry McGraw, filed a joint motion to dismiss
this appeal because the parties have reached a settlement. The motion
indicates that the parties have agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice to
refiling. The joint motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Accordingly, pursuant
to the agreement of the parties, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a).
MATT JOHNSON Chief Justice
OPINION DELIVERED and FILED: June 5, 2025 Before Chief Justice Johnson, Justice Smith, and Justice Harris Appeal dismissed CV06
Scott v. McGraw Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clyde Scott and Amanda Scott v. George McGraw and Sherry McGraw, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clyde-scott-and-amanda-scott-v-george-mcgraw-and-sherry-mcgraw-texapp-2025.