Clyde Martin, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 8, 2015
DocketA15A1723
StatusPublished

This text of Clyde Martin, Jr. v. State (Clyde Martin, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clyde Martin, Jr. v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ June 22, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1723. CLYDE MARTIN, JR. v. THE STATE.

In April 2000, Clyde Martin, Jr. pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. In February 2015, Martin filed a motion to vacate a void sentence, arguing that his sentence is void because he entered a negotiated plea to possession of cocaine rather than possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The trial court denied the motion and Martin filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a void sentence, but only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). A sentence is void only if it imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611 (a) (409 SE2d 517) (1991). “Motions to vacate a void sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not authorize that sentence, most typically because it exceeds the most severe punishment for which the applicable penal statute provides.” Von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569, 572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). Here, despite Martin’s argument to the contrary, the record shows that Martin pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and was sentenced to 30 years imprisonment, 10 years to serve in prison without parole pursuant to the repeat offender statute and 20 years to serve on probation. This sentence does not impose punishment that the law does not allow. See OCGA §§ 16-13-30 (d); 17-10-7. Because Martin did not raise a colorable void sentence argument, this appeal must be DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 06/22/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. State
686 S.E.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2009)
Burg v. State
676 S.E.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Crumbley v. State
409 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1991)
von Thomas v. State
748 S.E.2d 446 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clyde Martin, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clyde-martin-jr-v-state-gactapp-2015.