Clyde Latrell Gray v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Clyde Latrell Gray v. The State of Texas
Appellate case numbers: 01-17-00850-CR
Trial court case numbers: 1562576
Trial court: 263rd District Court of Harris County
Appellant, Clyde Latrell Gray, has filed a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant, however, is represented by counsel in this appeal. Until a motion to withdraw is granted, appointed counsel continues to represent appellant. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 411 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). And, appellant is not entitled to “hybrid representation,” that is, “representation partly by counsel and partly by self.” Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 921 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Scheanette v. State, 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s motion. Appellant and his counsel should confer. If appellant no longer wishes to prosecute his appeal, appellant’s counsel should file a motion that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) in the appeal. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: __April 30, 2019___
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clyde Latrell Gray v. State (Clyde Latrell Gray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.