Clyde Eugene Barrett v. Melinda Williams Linda Stanley Ken Bradley Teresa Hale
Opinion
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Clyde Eugene BARRETT, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Melinda WILLIAMS; Linda Stanley; Ken Bradley; Teresa
Hale, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7271.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.
Decided Jan. 19, 1995.
Clyde Eugene Barrett, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barrett v. Williams, No. CA-94-882 (W.D.Va. Oct. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
46 F.3d 1122 (Clyde Eugene Barrett v. Melinda Williams Linda Stanley Ken Bradley Teresa Hale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.