Clute v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank

12 N.Y.S. 148, 35 N.Y. St. Rep. 514, 58 Hun 608, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3361
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 10, 1890·Published

Opinion

Dykman, J.

There'never was any merit in the plaintiff’s action, and that destitution of merit extends to this appeal. The decisions of the court of appeals in the ease of Clute v. Emmerich, 99 N. Y. 342, 2 N. E. Rep. 6, and Bank v. Clute, 114 N. Y. 634, 21 N. E. Rep. 1021, control all the questions involved in this action. The title of the plaintiff and his wife being at all times subordinate to the lien of the mortgage from Cottrell to the defendant, they can have no remedy in hostility thereto. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clute v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank, 12 N.Y.S. 148, 35 N.Y. St. Rep. 514, 58 Hun 608, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3361 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

12 N.Y.S. 148 (Clute v. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clute v. . Emmerich
2 N.E. 6 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. . Clute
21 N.E. 1021 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)