Clurman v. Clurman
405 N.E.2d 708, 49 N.Y.2d 914, 428 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2265
Opinion
Motion to dismiss the appeal herein, which is limited by defendant’s notice of appeal to be from only so much of the Appellate Division order as modified Special Term’s order by denying defendant’s cross motion to compel arbitration, and thus finally determining a separate special proceeding, denied. (See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v Griesenbeck, 21 NY2d 688, 690.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clurman v. Clurman, 405 N.E.2d 708, 49 N.Y.2d 914, 428 N.Y.S.2d 227, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2265 (N.Y. 1980).
405 N.E.2d 708 (Clurman v. Clurman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Griesenbeck
234 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)