Clune v.Hayduk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clune v.Hayduk

45 A.D.2d 939, 359 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4220

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 19, 1974·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 9, 1974, reversed, on the law and the facts, petition reinstated, and petitioner’s name directed to be placed on the ballot. 1,250 signatures were required. 1,233 signatures were concededly valid. Concededly, there are sufficient additional signatures to validate the petition if the same is not invalid by reason of the error by the subscribing witness. We find that there was substantial compliance with the Election Law (cf. Matter of Rosen v. McNab, 25 N Y 2d 798). Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 9, 1974, reversed, on the law and the facts, petition reinstated, and petitioner’s name directed to be placed on the ballot. 1,250 signatures were required. 1,233 signatures were concededly valid. Concededly, there are sufficient additional signatures to validate the petition if the same is not invalid by reason of the error by the subscribing witness. We find that there was substantial compliance with the Election Law (cf. Matter of Rosen v. McNab, 25 N Y 2d 798). Gulotta, P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Clune v.Hayduk, 45 A.D.2d 939, 359 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

45 A.D.2d 939 (Clune v.Hayduk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.