Clune v. Clune

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Clune v. Clune

13 Mass. App. Ct. 973

DecidedMarch 9, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Mass. App. Ct. 973 (Clune v. Clune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clune v. Clune, 13 Mass. App. Ct. 973 (Mass. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In connection with atdivorce under G. L. c. 208, § IB, as amended by St. 1977, c. 531, § 2, a probate judge ordered the husband to convey his whole interest in the marital home in Danvers owned by the husband and his then wife as tenants by the entirety. This constituted the principal asset of the parties. The evidence is not before us. His findings disclose that he considered the pertinent circumstances and factors as required by G. L. c. 208, § 34. We cannot say that his decision was not justified on the basis of his findings.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In connection with atdivorce under G. L. c. 208, § IB, as amended by St. 1977, c. 531, § 2, a probate judge ordered the husband to convey his whole interest in the marital home in Danvers owned by the husband and his then wife as tenants by the entirety. This constituted the principal asset of the parties. The evidence is not before us. His findings disclose that he considered the pertinent circumstances and factors as required by G. L. c. 208, § 34. We cannot say that his decision was not justified on the basis of his findings.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Mass. App. Ct. 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clune-v-clune-massappct-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack