Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Clumm v. Singletary

Clumm v. Singletary

706 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2236, 1998 WL 85415
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2386
StatusPublished

This text of 706 So. 2d 128 (Clumm v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clumm v. Singletary, 706 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2236, 1998 WL 85415 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although this case was filed as an appeal from the circuit court’s denial of a petition for a writ of mandamus to review the Department of Corrections’ forfeiture of the inmate’s gain time after violation and revocation of control release,' pursuant to Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), petition for review filed, ease no. 92,260, we treat this appeal as a petition for a writ of certiorari. In accordance with Bowles v. Singletary, 698 So.2d 1201 (Fla.1997), certiorari is hereby denied.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowles v. Singletary
698 So. 2d 1201 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Sheley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
703 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2236, 1998 WL 85415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clumm-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1998.