Cluley v. Lansing Board of Water and Light
726 N.W.2d 45, 477 Mich. 1003
This text of 726 N.W.2d 45 (Cluley v. Lansing Board of Water and Light) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cluley v. Lansing Board of Water and Light, 726 N.W.2d 45, 477 Mich. 1003 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Virginia CLULEY, and David Cluley, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
LANSING BOARD OF WATER AND LIGHT, and John Elashkar, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 7, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
726 N.W.2d 45, 477 Mich. 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cluley-v-lansing-board-of-water-and-light-mich-2007.