Clugston v. Smith
218 F. App'x 683
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellees’ motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clugston v. Smith, 218 F. App'x 683 (9th Cir. 2007).
218 F. App'x 683 (Clugston v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)