Cluff v. United States Customs and Border Protection

District Court, S.D. California·Decided June 2, 2021·No. 3:21-cv-00115·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 || GARRETT JAMES CLUFF, Case No.: 21cv115-L-LL 12 Plants, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 |] Vv. DISMISS AS MOOT | UNITED STATES CUSTOMS. AND □□ □□

16 Defendants. 17 Pending before the court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant United States 18 || Customs and Border Protection. [ECF no. 4.] In lieu of opposing the motion, Plaintiff 19 || filed an amended complaint. [ECF no. 5.] Accordingly, motion to dismiss is denied as 20 || moot. See Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). 21 Defendants shall file a response to the amended complaint, if any, no later than the time 22 |! provided for in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3). 24 ||Dated: June 1, 2021 25 Ny fr fate, ? 26 H . James Lorenz, United States District Judge 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cluff v. United States Customs and Border Protection, (S.D. Cal. 2021).

Cluff v. United States Customs and Border Protection (Cluff v. United States Customs and Border Protection) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sergio Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino
806 F.3d 1002 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)