Club Auto Renting Service, Inc. v. City of New York

149 Misc. 312, 267 N.Y.S. 122, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1651
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 27, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 Misc. 312 (Club Auto Renting Service, Inc. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Club Auto Renting Service, Inc. v. City of New York, 149 Misc. 312, 267 N.Y.S. 122, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1651 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1933).

Opinion

Ingraham, J.

This action has been brought to recover the amount of $2,071.50 alleged to be due to the plaintiff from the city of New York for furnishing automobiles and chauffeurs. The debt was incurred by the administration headed by Mayor Walker and came about through his committee for the reception of distinguished guests hiring through its chairman the automobiles in question in connection with the official duties of the committee. The services for the payment of which this action is brought cover a period from August 25, 1931, to February 25, 1932, and many of the items making up the total sued for here are less than $100 and the largest item is barely over $500.

The city has previously paid for similar services without dispute. The present administration, through the corporation counsel, with commendable zeal and entirely proper diligence, opposes the payment of this balance, resting its opposition upon sections 39 and 419 of the Greater New York Charter, a position prompted, undoubtedly, by a sincere desire to commit no extravagance and make no unwarranted expenditure. I feel, however, that to refuse to recognize plaintiff’s claim as a valid one would be unjust and inequitable. Similar services have been paid for without dispute. The various items making up the total are less than $1,000 and it would not appear that the purposes for which the automobiles were furnished violate section 39 of the Greater New York Charter.

Judgment is accordingly given in favor of the plaintiff, together with interest -thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grand Central Cadillac Renting Corp. v. City of New York
153 Misc. 681 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 Misc. 312, 267 N.Y.S. 122, 1933 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/club-auto-renting-service-inc-v-city-of-new-york-nysupct-1933.