Cloyes Collins and Lavare Collins v. United States
This text of 448 F.2d 787 (Cloyes Collins and Lavare Collins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
448 F.2d 787
Cloyes COLLINS and Lavare Collins, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 26818.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
October 8, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Irving Hill, Judge.
Michael B. Arkin (argued), of Surr & Hellyer, San Bernardino, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants.
Gilbert Andrews (argued), Atty., Dept. of Justice, Johnnie M. Walters, Asst Atty. Gen., Tax Div., Washington, D.C., Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Charles H. Magnuson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and BATTIN,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of the district court in this income tax case is affirmed on the opinion of the district judge. Collins v. United States, C.D.Cal., 318 F.Supp. 382.
Notes:
The Honorable James F. Battin, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 F.2d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cloyes-collins-and-lavare-collins-v-united-states-ca9-1971.