Clowers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Clowers v. State

1918 OK CR 103, 173 P. 372, 14 Okla. Crim. 695, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 166

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 17, 1918

DocketNo. A-2921.

StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK CR 103 (Clowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clowers v. State, 1918 OK CR 103, 173 P. 372, 14 Okla. Crim. 695, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 166 (Okla. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Doc Clowers was convicted in the county court of Pittsburg county, of the crime of malicious mischief, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $50.00. To reverse this judgment an appeal was perfected in this court by filing a petition in error with case-made attached. .This case was assigned for oral argument at the May term, 1917, but no appearance was made by counsel who took the appeal, nor has any brief been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, The court, however, has carefully examined the record and finds no fundamental error. The information and the evidence in support thereof are apparently sufficient to sustain the judgment, and 'the.same is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Doc Clowers was convicted in the county court of Pittsburg county, of the crime of malicious mischief, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days and to pay a fine of $50.00. To reverse this judgment an appeal was perfected in this court by filing a petition in error with case-made attached. .This case was assigned for oral argument at the May term, 1917, but no appearance was made by counsel who took the appeal, nor has any brief been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, The court, however, has carefully examined the record and finds no fundamental error. The information and the evidence in support thereof are apparently sufficient to sustain the judgment, and 'the.same is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1918 OK CR 103, 173 P. 372, 14 Okla. Crim. 695, 1918 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clowers-v-state-oklacrimapp-1918.