Clowers v. Crandduck

Eighth Circuit

Clowers v. Crandduck

695 F. App'x 178

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 14, 2017·No. No. 16-4367·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tom Clowers appeals following the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and its denial of his motion to reconsider the dismissal.

Having conducted a thorough review, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Tom Clowers appeals following the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and its denial of his motion to reconsider the dismissal.

Having conducted a thorough review, we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons explained by the district court. See Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp, Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo). The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Clowers v. Crandduck, 695 F. App'x 178 (8th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

695 F. App'x 178 (Clowers v. Crandduck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related