Clowdis v. State

168 S.E. 768, 176 Ga. 755, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 281
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 18, 1933·No. No. 9419·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Hill, J.

The act of 1918 (Ga. L. 1918, p. 259) requires that the testimony of the female be supported. The present ease being controlled by that statute, the evidence is insufficient to authorize the verdict of guilty, there being no evidence to support the testimony of the female alleged to have been raped. The motion for new trial embraces only the general grounds, and the judge erred in refusing a new trial. 52 C. J. 1103, § 136(b) et seq.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur except

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clowdis v. State, 168 S.E. 768, 176 Ga. 755, 1933 Ga. LEXIS 281 (Ga. 1933).

168 S.E. 768 (Clowdis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
190 S.E. 663 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)