Clovsky v. Ronald BB.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Clovsky v. Ronald BB.

199 A.D.2d 800, 605 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12210

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 1993·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Chemung County (Bonsignore, H.E.), entered February 25, 1993, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, to adjudicate respondent as the father of a child born to Theresa AA.

In our view, Family Court’s adjudication of respondent’s paternity was supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record. This evidence consisted of the mother’s uncontradicted testimony and genetic blood marker tests indicating a 99.66% probability of paternity.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Cardona and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Chemung County (Bonsignore, H.E.), entered February 25, 1993, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, to adjudicate respondent as the father of a child born to Theresa AA.

In our view, Family Court’s adjudication of respondent’s paternity was supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record. This evidence consisted of the mother’s uncontradicted testimony and genetic blood marker tests indicating a 99.66% probability of paternity.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Cardona and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Clovsky v. Ronald BB., 199 A.D.2d 800, 605 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

199 A.D.2d 800 (Clovsky v. Ronald BB.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.