Clovsky v. Ronald BB.

199 A.D.2d 800, 605 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12210

This text of 199 A.D.2d 800 (Clovsky v. Ronald BB.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clovsky v. Ronald BB., 199 A.D.2d 800, 605 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Chemung County (Bonsignore, H.E.), entered February 25, 1993, which, inter alia, granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5, to adjudicate respondent as the father of a child born to Theresa AA.

In our view, Family Court’s adjudication of respondent’s paternity was supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record. This evidence consisted of the mother’s uncontradicted testimony and genetic blood marker tests indicating a 99.66% probability of paternity.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Cardona and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 A.D.2d 800, 605 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clovsky-v-ronald-bb-nyappdiv-1993.