Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson
This text of 315 U.S. 786 (Cloverleaf Butter Co. v. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of February 2, 1942, ante, p. 148, is amended as follows:
On page 4, line 5, strike out the words “comes under” and substitute therefor the words “is subject to.”
On page 14, line 15, strike out the word “watches” and substitute therefor the words “has authority to watch.” On page 15, line 7, strike out the word “subjected” and substitute therefor the word “subject.”
On page 15, lines 7 and 8, strike out the word “continuous.”
Respondents’ petition for rehearing is denied.
Opinion reported as amended, ante, p. 148.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 U.S. 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cloverleaf-butter-co-v-patterson-scotus-1942.