Cloverdale Foods Co. v. State

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 30, 1975
Docket13074
StatusPublished

This text of Cloverdale Foods Co. v. State (Cloverdale Foods Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cloverdale Foods Co. v. State, (Mo. 1975).

Opinion

No. 13074 I N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1975

CU)VERDALE FOODS COMPANY, a North Dakota C o r p o r a t i o n , P l a i n t i f f and A p p e l l a n t ,

THE STATE OF MONTANA, and t h e DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS REGULATION, a n a d m i n i s t r a t i v e agency o f t h e S t a t e o f Montana, D e f e n d a n t s and Respondents.

Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court o f t h e F i r s t J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t Honorable P e t e r G. Meloy, Judge p r e s i d i n g . Counsel o f Record: For P l a i n t i f f : S m a l l , Cummins and Hatch, Helena, Montana Gregory J a c k s o n a r g u e d , Helena, Montana F o r Respondents: James H McFarland a r g u e d , Helena, Montana James Wood, Helena, Montana

Submitted: September 30, 1975 M r . J u s t i c e Gene B . Daly d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court.

T h i s i s an a p p e a l by Cloverdale Foods Company from an a d v e r s e d e c i s i o n i n a d e c l a r a t o r y judgment a c t i o n t r i e d t o t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , Lewis and C l a r k County. I n t h e f a l l 1974, C l o v e r d a l e Foods Company ( h e r e i n a f t e r c a l l e d C l o v e r d a l e ) , a North Dakota c o r p o r a t i o n l i c e n s e d t o do b u s i n e s s i n t h e s t a t e o f Montana, began s e l l i n g and o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e i n t h i s s t a t e milk i n t h r e e q u a r t containers. On November 1 4 , 1974, t h e S t a t e of Montana, a c t i n g

through t h e Department of Business R e g u l a t i o n , D i v i s i o n of Weights and Measures, h e r e i n a f t e r c a l l e d S t a t e , n o t i f i e d C l o v e r d a l e t h a t i n so s e l l i n g and o f f e r i n g f o r s a l e i t s milk i n t h r e e q u a r t con- t a i n e r s i t was i n v i o l a t i o n of s e c t i o n 90-180, R.C.M. 1947, which provides : "Fluid d a i r y p r o d u c t s . A l l f l u i d d a i r y p r o d u c t s , i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o whole m i l k , skimmed m i l k , c u l t u r e d m i l k , sweet cream, s o u r cream, and b u t t e r m i l k , s h a l l be packaged f o r r e t a i l s a l e o n l y i n u n i t s of one (1) g i l l , one-half (112) l i q u i d p i n t , t e n (10) f l u i d ounces, one (1) l i q u i d p i n t , one (1) l i q u i d q u a r t , one- h a l f (112) g a l l o n , one (1) g a l l o n , one and one-half (1-112) g a l l o n s , two (2) g a l l o n s , two and one-half (2-112) g a l l o n s , o r m u l t i p l e s of one (1) g a l l o n ; provided, t h a t packages i n u n i t s of l e s s t h a n one (1) g i l l s h a l l be permitted." (Emphasis s u p p l i e d ) . It t h u s o r d e r e d Cloverdale t o c e a s e t h e s a l e of milk s o packaged. Cloverdale brought a d e c l a r a t o r y judgment a c t i o n a g a i n s t the State. A t t h e time t h e complaint was f i l e d , an o r d e r t o show

c a u s e and a temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r i s s u e d from t h e d i s t r i c t court. The S t a t e f i l e d a motion t o quash t h e temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r and a b r i e f i n s u p p o r t . Subsequent t h e r e t o , t h e m a t t e r was t r i e d t o the d i s t r i c t court. The c o u r t f i l e d f i n d i n g s of f a c t and c o n c l u s i o n s of law i n f a v o r of t h e S t a t e . Those f i n d i n g s of f a c t and c o n c l u s i o n s of law, i n p e r t i n e n t p a r t , provided: "FINDINGS O FACT F "7 * ik * "a. That a l l milk which p l a i n t i f f s e l l s i n Montana complies w i t h a l l s t a t e and f e d e r a l h e a l t h o r s a n i t a t i o n requirements; "b. That t h e s i z e of c o n t a i n e r used i n packaging does n o t a f f e c t t h e q u a l i t y o r s t a n d a r d of t h e milk contained t h e r e i n ; "c. That i n t h e manufacture of t h r e e (3) q u a r t c o n t a i n e r s a s compared t o s m a l l e r c o n t a i n e r s l e s s o i l and wood products would be used; "d. That S e c t i o n 90-180, R.C.M. 1947, provides reasonable s i z e s o r c l a s s i f i c a t i o n s (and numbers) f o r t h e c o n t a i n e r s of milk a s f o l l o w s : one (1) g i l l one-half (1/2) l i q u i d p i n t t e n (10) f l u i d ounces one (1) l i q u i d p i n t one (1) l i q u i d q u a r t one-half (1/2) g a l l o n one (1) g a l l o n one and one-half (1-1/2) g a l l o n s two ' ( 2 ) g a l l o n s two and one-half (2-1/2) g a l l o n s m u l t i p l e s of one (1) g a l l o n 1I e . The t h r e e (3) q u a r t c o n t a i n e r i s n o t a s i z e g e n e r a l l y recognized by t h e p u b l i c and i s of such s i z e and appearance t h a t i t w i l l be mistaken f o r t h e w e l l - known one (1) g a l l o n c o n t a i n e r by t h e p u b l i c and a c c o r d i n g l y c r e a t e s t h e p o t e n t i a l of d e c e p t i o n ; "f. That t h e p r e s e n t l y e x i s t i n g s i z e s (and number of s i z e s ) of milk c o n t a i n e r s a d e q u a t e l y and reasonably meet t h e need and demands of t h e p u b l i c ; "g. That t h e a d d i t i o n of y e t a n o t h e r c o n t a i n e r s i z e w i l l r e q u i r e s u b s t a n t i a l investment by milk p r o c e s s o r s and t h o s e investment c o s t s w i l l b e u l t i m a t e l y borne by t h e public, t o i t s detriment; "h. That t h e e n t i r e system of weights and measures w i l l a p p a r e n t l y soon be switched t o t h e m e t r i c system which w i l l r e q u i r e s u b s t a n t i a l investment of c a p i t a l by milk p r o c e s s o r s t o comply t h e r e w i t h ; "i. That i t i s i n t h e p u b l i c i n t e r e s t because of t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r f r a u d , deception and misunderstanding t h a t t h e number (and s i z e ) of milk c o n t a i n e r s be reasonably l i m i t e d under t h e p o l i c e power. 11 "CONCLUSIONS OF LAW "3. That S e c t i o n 90-180, R.C.M. 1947, provides r e a s o n a b l e s i z e s and numbers of s i z e s f o r milk con- t a i n e r s and they b e a r a r e a l and s u b s t a n t i a l r e l a t i o n - s h i p t o t h e e x e r c i s e of t h e p o l i c e power and f o r t h e purpose of p r e s e r v i n g p u b l i c h e a l t h , s a f e t y , morals o r g e n e r a l w e l f a r e and preventing f r a u d ; t h a t , t h e r e f o r e , it is constitutional. "4. That S e c t i o n 90-180, R.C.M. 1947 does n o t d i s - c r i m i n a t e a g a i n s t p l a i n t i f f n o r d e p r i v e p l a i n t i f f of t h e e q u a l p r o t e c t i o n of t h e laws, a s provided under t h e C o n s t i t u t i o n of Montana o r t h e C o n s t i t u t i o n of t h e United S t a t e s . "5. That t h e language of S e c t i o n 90-180, R.C.M. 1947, c l e a r l y and reasonably p r o h i b i t s t h e packaging of d a i r y products i n t h r e e (3) q u a r t c o n t a i n e r s . "6. That t h e u s e of t h e t h r e e (3) q u a r t c o n t a i n e r s i s p r o h i b i t e d f o r t h e r e t a i l packaging, s a l e , marketing and d i s t r i b u t i o n of d a i r y products i n Montana. "7. That t h e temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r h e r e t o f o r e issued i s dissolved. 1I Let Judgment be e n t e r e d accordingly. Cloverdale o b j e c t e d t o t h e f i n d i n g s and moved t h e c o u r t f o r a new t r i a l . T h e r e a f t e r t h e c o u r t denied t h e motion f o r a new t r i a l , o v e r r u l e d c lover dale's o b j e c t i o n s and d i s s o l v e d t h e r e s t r a i n - ing order. Judgment was then e n t e r e d i n f a v o r of t h e S t a t e . Cloverdale then p e t i t i o n e d t h i s Court t o s t a y execution of t h e judg- ment pending appeal. The s t a y pending a p p e a l was g r a n t e d and t h e appeal perfected. O a p p e a l , Cloverdale p r e s e n t s t h e s e i s s u e s : n 1) Whether s e c t i o n 90-180, R.C.M.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cherry Lane Farms of Montana, Inc. v. Carter
456 P.2d 296 (Montana Supreme Court, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cloverdale Foods Co. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cloverdale-foods-co-v-state-mont-1975.