Clover Leaf Casualty Co. v. National Life Insurance

103 S.E. 689, 25 Ga. App. 382, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 816
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1920·No. 11234·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When the charge of the court as given is considered in its entirety and in connection with all the facts of the case, there is no reversible error in any of the excerpts therefrom of which complaint is made.

2. The requests to charge, so far as legal and pertinent, were covered by the charge given.

3. The court did not err in admitting the evidence of .which complaint is made in the 8th ground of the motion for new trial.

4. There was evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Dorsey, Shelton & Dorsey, G. L. Bynum, for plaintiffs in error. Moore & Pomeroy, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clover Leaf Casualty Co. v. National Life Insurance, 103 S.E. 689, 25 Ga. App. 382, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 816 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

103 S.E. 689 (Clover Leaf Casualty Co. v. National Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related