Clover Leaf Casualty Co. v. National Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Clover Leaf Casualty Co. v. National Life Insurance

103 S.E. 689, 25 Ga. App. 382, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 816

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1920

Docket11234

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 S.E. 689 (Clover Leaf Casualty Co. v. National Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clover Leaf Casualty Co. v. National Life Insurance, 103 S.E. 689, 25 Ga. App. 382, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 816 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When the charge of the court as given is considered in its entirety and in connection with all the facts of the case, there is no reversible error in any of the excerpts therefrom of which complaint is made.

2. The requests to charge, so far as legal and pertinent, were covered by the charge given.

3. The court did not err in admitting the evidence of .which complaint is made in the 8th ground of the motion for new trial.

4. There was evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Dorsey, Shelton & Dorsey, G. L. Bynum, for plaintiffs in error. Moore & Pomeroy, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. When the charge of the court as given is considered in its entirety and in connection with all the facts of the case, there is no reversible error in any of the excerpts therefrom of which complaint is made.

2. The requests to charge, so far as legal and pertinent, were covered by the charge given.

3. The court did not err in admitting the evidence of .which complaint is made in the 8th ground of the motion for new trial.

4. There was evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. Dorsey, Shelton & Dorsey, G. L. Bynum, for plaintiffs in error. Moore & Pomeroy, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 S.E. 689, 25 Ga. App. 382, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clover-leaf-casualty-co-v-national-life-insurance-gactapp-1920.

Opinion

4. There was evidence to support the verdict.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack