Clover-East Associates v. Bachler
This text of 23 A.D.2d 620 (Clover-East Associates v. Bachler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed in accordance with the Memorandum, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: It is conceded that [621]*621oral argument of the motion was had before one Justice of the Supreme Court and thereafter without consultation with the parties or their attorneys and without stipulation the papers were sent to another Justice who without any argument decided the motion in respondent’s favor. Section 21 of the Judiciary Law specifically provides that a Judge other than an appellate one “shall not decide or take part in the decision of a question, which was argued orally in the court, when he was not present and sitting therein as a judge.” The order appealed from was made under the very circumstances prohibited by this section and therefore must be vacated (Smith v. State of New York, 214 N. Y. 140, 144; People v. Hooper, 22 A D 2d 1006). We have dealt solely with the procedural question involved and pass upon no other questions presented by the briefs. (Appeal from order of Monroe Trial Term denying application of defendants to strike case from the Jury Calendar and directing trial as a nonjury case.) Present — 'Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecehio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 A.D.2d 620, 256 N.Y.S.2d 914, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clover-east-associates-v-bachler-nyappdiv-1965.