Clouser v. State

152 So. 2d 200, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3613
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 1963·No. No. 3235·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jack W. Clouser appeals his conviction and sentence on counts charging conspiracy, robbery, kidnapping and aggravated assault. Co-defendants Louis Harper and Edward Rogers were convicted on similar charges in the same trial.

In his closing argument the prosecutor commented on the failure of co-defendant Edward Rogers to testify. Defendant [201]*201Clouser now contends on his separate appeal thnt. the comment was prejudicial to him also since it was reasonably calculated to raise a question in the jurors’ minds as to his own failure to testify. This question was recently decided by this court in reversing the conviction of co-defendant Louis Harper. Accordingly the conviction and sentence in the instant case are reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial. See Harper v. State, Fla.App., 2nd District, 151 So.2d 881.

Reversed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., and ALLEN and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clouser v. State, 152 So. 2d 200, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3613 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

152 So. 2d 200 (Clouser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singleton v. State
183 So. 2d 245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)