Cloukie v. Semple
This text of 153 P. 319 (Cloukie v. Semple) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the trial below, upon the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, defendant moved for a nonsuit for failure of proof on the part of plaintiff, and defendant offered no testimony. Thereafter the trial judge made affirmative [535]*535findings of fact supporting the affirmative allegations of defendant’s answer, and conclusions of law in conformity therewith, and entered judgment, referring to the findings and conclusions, and adjudged that “plaintiff take nothing under his complaint herein and that the said complaint be dismissed.”
It is conceded by respondent that she was not entitled to any affirmative relief upon a nonsuit for failure of proof on the part of appellant, but that appellant is not injured, for he can treat the judgment as a mere judgment of dismissal or nonsuit and govern himself accordingly. The difficulty is that the record does not so warrant. In any future action, this judgment could be effectively set up and pleaded in bar, and present counsel for respondent, however honorable and ethical, might not have control of the matter.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to enter an order or judgment annulling and setting aside the findings of fact and conclusions of law entered thereon, and enter a simple judgment of nonsuit and dismissal of the cause without prejudice.
Appellant will have his costs of appeal.
Morris, C. J., Bausman, Parker, and Main, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 P. 319, 88 Wash. 534, 1915 Wash. LEXIS 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cloukie-v-semple-wash-1915.