Clough v. Wilton
This text of 104 A. 453 (Clough v. Wilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The fact P. S., c. 2, s. 34, provides that the day from which time is to be reckoned is to be excluded in computing the time within which an act must be done, tends to the conclusion that that is the only day to be excluded in making the computation. As there is nothing to rebut this conclusion it must be held that the appeal was not claimed within the time limited by P. S., c. 200, s. 2. It does not necessarily follow that the appellant is remediless, for ss. 7-9 of this chapter provide that one who is prevented from claiming an appeal by accident, mistake or misfortune may petition the court for relief, and it has been held that a mistake of counsel may be a misfortune within the meaning of s. 7. Grout v. Cole, 57 N. H. 547; St. Pierre v. Foster, 75 N. H. 10, 11.
Case discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 A. 453, 79 N.H. 66, 1918 N.H. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clough-v-wilton-nh-1918.