Clough v. Greyhound Corp.

88 S.E.2d 700, 92 Ga. App. 558, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 641
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 7, 1955·No. 35275·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Quillian, J.

The judgment of this court reversing the judgment of the trial court which overruled the motion for a new trial, having been reversed by the Supreme Court (Greyhound Corporation v. Clough, 211 Ga. 574, 87 S. E. 2d 387), the judgment of reversal by this court is hereby vacated.

We did not pass upon the general grounds of the motion for new trial when writing the original opinion in this case. No error of law requiring a new trial appears from the record, and there was sufficient conflict in the evidence as to whether the plaintiff sustained the injuries alleged in the petition to carry the issue to the jury. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

[559]*559Decided July 7, 1955 Rehearing denied July 26, 1955. Nall, Sterne & Miller, Paul Cadenhead, for plaintiff in error. Gambrell, Harlan, Barwick, Russell & Smith, James C. Hill, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., Gardner, P. J., Townsend, Carlisle, and Nichols, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clough v. Greyhound Corp., 88 S.E.2d 700, 92 Ga. App. 558, 1955 Ga. App. LEXIS 641 (Ga. Ct. App. 1955).

88 S.E.2d 700 (Clough v. Greyhound Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeFunis v. Odegaard
529 P.2d 438 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)