Clough v. Dineen

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Clough v. Dineen

552 A.2d 548, 1989 Me. LEXIS 6

DecidedJanuary 11, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 552 A.2d 548 (Clough v. Dineen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clough v. Dineen, 552 A.2d 548, 1989 Me. LEXIS 6 (Me. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court (York County; Fritzsche, J.) dismissing James M. Dineen’s appeal from the judgment against him in the District Court sitting as the Small Claims Court (Kittery; [549]*549Gaulin, J.). Because the Superior Court was required to dismiss the appeal for lack of timeliness under M.R.S.C.P. 11(a), we need not address the other issues Dineen attempted to raise on his appeal from the District Court.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court (York County; Fritzsche, J.) dismissing James M. Dineen’s appeal from the judgment against him in the District Court sitting as the Small Claims Court (Kittery; [549]*549Gaulin, J.). Because the Superior Court was required to dismiss the appeal for lack of timeliness under M.R.S.C.P. 11(a), we need not address the other issues Dineen attempted to raise on his appeal from the District Court.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 A.2d 548, 1989 Me. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clough-v-dineen-me-1989.