Clough v. Dawson

Oregon Supreme Court

Clough v. Dawson

133 P. 345, 69 Or. 52

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 8, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 133 P. 345 (Clough v. Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clough v. Dawson, 133 P. 345, 69 Or. 52 (Or. 1913).

Pincite

Opinions

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal based on the ground that the transcript does not contain all the testimony given at the trial.

1, 2. The record before us includes certified copies of the notice of appeal, the undertaking therefor, and the decree that was given, thereby -conferring upon this court jurisdiction of the cause. "Whether or not sufficient testimony has been included in the transcript to authorize a review of the decree cannot be determined in this primary proceeding.

The motion to dismiss appeal is therefore denied.

Motion Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal based on the ground that the transcript does not contain all the testimony given at the trial.

1, 2. The record before us includes certified copies of the notice of appeal, the undertaking therefor, and the decree that was given, thereby -conferring upon this court jurisdiction of the cause. "Whether or not sufficient testimony has been included in the transcript to authorize a review of the decree cannot be determined in this primary proceeding.

The motion to dismiss appeal is therefore denied.

Motion Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 P. 345, 69 Or. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clough-v-dawson-or-1913.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack