Clough v. Dawson

133 P. 345, 69 Or. 52
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided July 8, 1913·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinions

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal based on the ground that the transcript does not contain all the testimony given at the trial.

1, 2. The record before us includes certified copies of the notice of appeal, the undertaking therefor, and the decree that was given, thereby -conferring upon this court jurisdiction of the cause. "Whether or not sufficient testimony has been included in the transcript to authorize a review of the decree cannot be determined in this primary proceeding.

The motion to dismiss appeal is therefore denied.

Motion Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clough v. Dawson, 133 P. 345, 69 Or. 52 (Or. 1913).

133 P. 345 (Clough v. Dawson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wadsworth v. Talmage
450 P.3d 486 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2019)
Andre v. Morrow
680 P.2d 1355 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1984)
Alexander v. Central Oregon Irrigation District
528 P.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
O'Connell v. O'Connell
91 P.2d 1107 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1939)
Lasene v. Syvanen
263 P. 59 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)
Eaid v. National Casualty Co.
259 P. 902 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)
Walker v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
257 P. 701 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)
Fitzpatrick v. Sletten
242 P. 1114 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
Schlussel v. Hays
174 P. 722 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1918)
Rowe v. Freeman
172 P. 508 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1918)
Crabb v. Watts
249 F. 357 (D. Oregon, 1918)
State v. Hyde
169 P. 757 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1918)
Davenport v. Burke
167 P. 481 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)
Humason v. Orr
153 P. 61 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1915)