Cloud v. United States

515 F. App'x 242
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2013·No. No. 13-6047·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Roosevelt Cloud appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cloud v. United States, No. 3:12-ev-00775-RJC (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cloud v. United States, 515 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2013).

515 F. App'x 242 (Cloud v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cloud v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2020