Cloud Country West v. Hardgrave

New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 2020·Unpublished

Opinion

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer- generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-38108

CLOUD COUNTRY WEST UNITS TWO AND THREE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CHUCK HARDGRAVE AND MELISSA HARDGRAVE, husband and wife,

Defendants-Appellants.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY Angie K. Schneider, District Judge

Courvoisier Law, LLC Rebekah A. Scott Courvoisier Alamagordo, NM

for Appellee

Richard A. Hawthorne Ruidoso, NM

for Appellants

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VARGAS, Judge.

{1} We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition in this matter proposing to affirm the district court. Appellee has filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary disposition, and Appellant has not filed a memorandum in opposition. CONCLUSION

{2} Accordingly, for the reasons set out in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).

{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

WE CONCUR:

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cloud Country West v. Hardgrave, (N.M. Ct. App. 2020).

Cloud Country West v. Hardgrave (Cloud Country West v. Hardgrave) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Frick v. Veazey
861 P.2d 287 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1993)