Clott v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
178 A. 747, 115 N.J.L. 114, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 265
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clott v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, 178 A. 747, 115 N.J.L. 114, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 265 (N.J. 1935).
178 A. 747 (Clott v. Prudential Insurance Company of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Garford Trucking, Inc. v. Alliance Ins. Co. Of Philadelphia
195 F.2d 381 (Second Circuit, 1952)
Steelman v. Camden Trust Co.
39 A.2d 454 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
Trilling v. H. L. Green Co.
31 A.2d 206 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1943)
Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Nikolopulos
86 F.2d 12 (Third Circuit, 1936)
Fleming v. Connecticut General Insurance
181 A. 185 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)