Clothier v. Wallace

10 P.2d 889, 135 Kan. 347, 1932 Kan. LEXIS 212
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedMay 7, 1932
DocketNo. 30,456
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 P.2d 889 (Clothier v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clothier v. Wallace, 10 P.2d 889, 135 Kan. 347, 1932 Kan. LEXIS 212 (kan 1932).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The appeal is from an order of the district court denying a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the probate court.

Wallace Was guardian of Clothier, a person of feeble mind. The ward was restored to competency, and the guardian tendered to the probate court a report by way of final settlement. Exceptions were taken to the report. The probate court disposed of the case, and the ward appealed to the district court. In the district court the guardian moved to dismiss on the ground the ward had accepted benefits of the probate court settlement. As indicated, the motion was denied.

The order denying the motion to dismiss was not an appealable order. (R. S. 60-3303; Weigand v. Wilson, 107 Kan. 445, 193 Pac. 1065, and cases cited in the opinion.)

The appeal to this court is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Ellis
103 P.2d 817 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1940)
Iverson v. Claim of Zabel
75 P.2d 813 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1938)
Heiman v. State Highway Commission
69 P.2d 685 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 P.2d 889, 135 Kan. 347, 1932 Kan. LEXIS 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clothier-v-wallace-kan-1932.