Clothier v. Wallace

10 P.2d 889, 135 Kan. 347, 1932 Kan. LEXIS 212
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided May 7, 1932·No. No. 30,456·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The appeal is from an order of the district court denying a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the probate court.

Wallace Was guardian of Clothier, a person of feeble mind. The ward was restored to competency, and the guardian tendered to the probate court a report by way of final settlement. Exceptions were taken to the report. The probate court disposed of the case, and the ward appealed to the district court. In the district court the guardian moved to dismiss on the ground the ward had accepted benefits of the probate court settlement. As indicated, the motion was denied.

The order denying the motion to dismiss was not an appealable order. (R. S. 60-3303; Weigand v. Wilson, 107 Kan. 445, 193 Pac. 1065, and cases cited in the opinion.)

The appeal to this court is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clothier v. Wallace, 10 P.2d 889, 135 Kan. 347, 1932 Kan. LEXIS 212 (kan 1932).

10 P.2d 889 (Clothier v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Ellis
103 P.2d 817 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1940)
Iverson v. Claim of Zabel
75 P.2d 813 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1938)
Heiman v. State Highway Commission
69 P.2d 685 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1937)