Closuit v. Crane Environmental, Inc.

884 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14453, 2004 WL 2191558
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 2004
DocketNo. 2D03-2019
StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 441 (Closuit v. Crane Environmental, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Closuit v. Crane Environmental, Inc., 884 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14453, 2004 WL 2191558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Edward Closuit, Myriam Murphy, and Andalite Industries, Inc., appeal an order finding them in contempt for violating an injunction and assessing attorney’s fees and costs as a sanction. As we did in the related case of Osmo Tec SACV Co. v. Crane Environmental, Inc., No. 2D03-498, 2004 WL 1969574, 884 So.2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA Sept. 8, 2004), we reverse because the injunction did not prohibit the sale of Andalite’s assets to a third party.

Reversed and remanded.

KELLY, J„ and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osmo Tec SACV Co. v. CRANE ENVIRONMENTAL
884 So. 2d 324 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14453, 2004 WL 2191558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/closuit-v-crane-environmental-inc-fladistctapp-2004.