Closuit v. Crane Environmental, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Closuit v. Crane Environmental, Inc.

884 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14453, 2004 WL 2191558

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Closuit v. Crane Environmental, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11156 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 2004·No. No. 2D03-2019·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Edward Closuit, Myriam Murphy, and Andalite Industries, Inc., appeal an order finding them in contempt for violating an injunction and assessing attorney’s fees and costs as a sanction. As we did in the related case of Osmo Tec SACV Co. v. Crane Environmental, Inc., No. 2D03-498, 2004 WL 1969574, 884 So.2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA Sept. 8, 2004), we reverse because the injunction did not prohibit the sale of Andalite’s assets to a third party.

Reversed and remanded.

KELLY, J„ and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Edward Closuit, Myriam Murphy, and Andalite Industries, Inc., appeal an order finding them in contempt for violating an injunction and assessing attorney’s fees and costs as a sanction. As we did in the related case of Osmo Tec SACV Co. v. Crane Environmental, Inc., No. 2D03-498, 2004 WL 1969574, 884 So.2d 324 (Fla. 2d DCA Sept. 8, 2004), we reverse because the injunction did not prohibit the sale of Andalite’s assets to a third party.

Reversed and remanded.

KELLY, J„ and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.

Closuit v. Crane Environmental, Inc., 884 So. 2d 441, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14453, 2004 WL 2191558 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

884 So. 2d 441 (Closuit v. Crane Environmental, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related