Close v. Noye
4 Misc. 616, 26 N.Y.S. 93, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 115
Opinion
I am for an affirmance of the judgment appealed from solely on the authority of the case of Hawthorne v. Calef, 2 Wall. 10, which seems to hold that, notwithstanding the reservation by the legislature of the right to amend charters of corporations, the act of 1892 is unconstitutional as to the plaintiff in this action.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Close v. Noye, 4 Misc. 616, 26 N.Y.S. 93, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 115 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
4 Misc. 616 (Close v. Noye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barnes v. Arnold
23 Misc. 197 (New York Supreme Court, 1898)
Pearsall v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
73 F. 933 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota, 1895)