Close v. International Railway Co.
233 A.D. 894
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 233 A.D. 894 (Close v. International Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Close v. International Railway Co., 233 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
—-Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crouch and Edgeomb, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the facts on the ground of misconduct by counsel in willfully using in his argument documentary evidence in effect rejected on the trial. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Edgeomb and Thompson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
233 A.D. 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/close-v-international-railway-co-nyappdiv-1931.