Close v. Flanary

306 P.2d 121, 73 Nev. 1, 1957 Nev. LEXIS 66
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 1957
DocketNo. 3961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 P.2d 121 (Close v. Flanary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Close v. Flanary, 306 P.2d 121, 73 Nev. 1, 1957 Nev. LEXIS 66 (Neb. 1957).

Opinion

OPINION

On Motion to Dismiss

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from an order striking substantial matter from her complaint. Respondents have moved for dismissal of the appeal upon the ground that such an order is not an appeal-able order under Rule 72(b) N.R.C.P.

The order does not have the finality which might constitute it a final judgment nor is it among the orders before judgment specified as appealable. Accordingly, the motion must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gershenhorn v. Walter R. Stutz Enterprises
306 P.2d 121 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
306 P.2d 121, 73 Nev. 1, 1957 Nev. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/close-v-flanary-nev-1957.