Close v. Flanary

306 P.2d 121, 73 Nev. 1, 1957 Nev. LEXIS 66
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 1957·No. No. 3961·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

On Motion to Dismiss

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from an order striking substantial matter from her complaint. Respondents have moved for dismissal of the appeal upon the ground that such an order is not an appeal-able order under Rule 72(b) N.R.C.P.

The order does not have the finality which might constitute it a final judgment nor is it among the orders before judgment specified as appealable. Accordingly, the motion must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Close v. Flanary, 306 P.2d 121, 73 Nev. 1, 1957 Nev. LEXIS 66 (Neb. 1957).

306 P.2d 121 (Close v. Flanary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gershenhorn v. Walter R. Stutz Enterprises
306 P.2d 121 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1957)