Close v. Flanary
This text of 306 P.2d 121 (Close v. Flanary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
On Motion to Dismiss
This is an appeal by the plaintiff below from an order striking substantial matter from her complaint. Respondents have moved for dismissal of the appeal upon the ground that such an order is not an appeal-able order under Rule 72(b) N.R.C.P.
The order does not have the finality which might constitute it a final judgment nor is it among the orders before judgment specified as appealable. Accordingly, the motion must be granted.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 P.2d 121, 73 Nev. 1, 1957 Nev. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/close-v-flanary-nev-1957.