Close & Stewart v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 395
United States Customs Court·Decided April 5, 1956·No. No. 59828; protest 177329-K (Seattle)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of Swift & Company et al. v. United States (33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Close & Stewart v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 395 (cusc 1956).

36 Cust. Ct. 395 (Close & Stewart v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swift & Co. v. United States
33 Cust. Ct. 212 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)