Clore v. Drebach

150 So. 135, 111 Fla. 788, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2130
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 12, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 135 (Clore v. Drebach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clore v. Drebach, 150 So. 135, 111 Fla. 788, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2130 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order dismissing a bill of complaint by which it was' sought to re-establish a lost negotiable note and to have a personal decree against the defendants for the amount of the debt to be evidenced by the re-established note.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Burleson, et ux., v. Jesse French & Sons Piano Co., 90 Fla. 16, 104 Sou. 860, and cases there cited.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burleson v. Jesse French & Sons Piano Co.
104 So. 860 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 So. 135, 111 Fla. 788, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clore-v-drebach-fla-1933.