Clore v. Drebach

Supreme Court of Florida

Clore v. Drebach

150 So. 135, 111 Fla. 788, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2130

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 12, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order dismissing a bill of complaint by which it was' sought to re-establish a lost negotiable note and to have a personal decree against the defendants for the amount of the debt to be evidenced by the re-established note.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Burleson, et ux., v. Jesse French & Sons Piano Co., 90 Fla. 16, 104 Sou. 860, and cases there cited.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order dismissing a bill of complaint by which it was' sought to re-establish a lost negotiable note and to have a personal decree against the defendants for the amount of the debt to be evidenced by the re-established note.

The order appealed from should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in the case of Burleson, et ux., v. Jesse French & Sons Piano Co., 90 Fla. 16, 104 Sou. 860, and cases there cited.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Clore v. Drebach, 150 So. 135, 111 Fla. 788, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2130 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

150 So. 135 (Clore v. Drebach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related