Clopton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clopton v. State

783 S.W.2d 140, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823, 1989 WL 153489

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 1989·No. No. 55957·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Norris Clopton, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed his allegations, the record on which they are based, and the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We find the court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. No precedential purpose would be served by an extended opinion. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Norris Clopton, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed his allegations, the record on which they are based, and the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. We find the court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. No precedential purpose would be served by an extended opinion. Rule 84.16(b).

Clopton v. State, 783 S.W.2d 140, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1823, 1989 WL 153489 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

783 S.W.2d 140 (Clopton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.